The sell() method takes the nshares argument, however inside the method the variable shares is used instead. This patch changes the name of the argument according to the variable used within the method.
5.2 KiB
[ Index | Exercise 6.1 | Exercise 6.3 ]
Exercise 6.2
Objectives:
- Learn more about scoping rules
- Learn some scoping tricks
Files modified: structure.py
,
stock.py
In the last exercise, you created a class Structure
that
made it easy to define data structures. For example:
class Stock(Structure):
= ('name','shares','price') _fields
This works fine except that a lot of things are pretty weird about
the __init__()
function. For example, if you ask for help
using help(Stock)
, you don’t get any kind of useful
signature. Also, keyword argument passing doesn’t work. For example:
>>> help(Stock)
... look at output ...
>>> s = Stock(name='GOOG', shares=100, price=490.1)
Traceback (most recent call last):"<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'price'
>>>
In this exercise, we’re going to look at a different approach to the problem.
(a) Show me your locals
First, try an experiment by defining the following class:
>>> class Stock:
def __init__(self, name, shares, price):
print(locals())
>>>
Now, try running this:
>>> s = Stock('GOOG', 100, 490.1)
'self': <__main__.Stock object at 0x100699b00>, 'price': 490.1, 'name': 'GOOG', 'shares': 100}
{>>>
Notice how the locals dictionary contains all of the arguments passed
to __init__()
. That’s interesting. Now, define the
following function and class definitions:
>>> def _init(locs):
self = locs.pop('self')
for name, val in locs.items():
setattr(self, name, val)
>>> class Stock:
def __init__(self, name, shares, price):
locals()) _init(
In this code, the _init()
function is used to
automatically initialize an object from a dictionary of passed local
variables. You’ll find that help(Stock)
and keyword
arguments work perfectly.
>>> s = Stock(name='GOOG', price=490.1, shares=50)
>>> s.name
'GOOG'
>>> s.shares
50
>>> s.price
490.1
>>>
(b) Frame Hacking
One complaint about the last part is that the __init__()
function now looks pretty weird with that call to locals()
inserted into it. You can get around that though if you’re willing to do
a bit of stack frame hacking. Try this variant of the
_init()
function:
>>> import sys
>>> def _init():
= sys._getframe(1).f_locals # Get callers local variables
locs self = locs.pop('self')
for name, val in locs.items():
setattr(self, name, val)
>>>
In this code, the local variables are extracted from the stack frame of the caller. Here is a modified class definition:
>>> class Stock:
def __init__(self, name, shares, price):
_init()
>>> s = Stock('GOOG', 100, 490.1)
>>> s.name
'GOOG'
>>> s.shares
100
>>>
At this point, you’re probably feeling rather disturbed. Yes, you just wrote a function that reached into the stack frame of another function and examined its local variables.
(c) Putting it Together
Taking the ideas in the first two parts, delete the
__init__()
method that was originally part of the
Structure
class. Next, add an _init()
method
like this:
# structure.py
import sys
class Structure:
...@staticmethod
def _init():
= sys._getframe(1).f_locals
locs self = locs.pop('self')
for name, val in locs.items():
setattr(self, name, val)
...
Note: The reason this is defined as a @staticmethod
is
that the self
argument is obtained from the locals–there’s
no need to additionally have it passed as an argument to the method
itself (admittedly this is a bit subtle).
Now, modify your Stock
class so that it looks like the
following:
# stock.py
from structure import Structure
class Stock(Structure):
= ('name','shares','price')
_fields def __init__(self, name, shares, price):
self._init()
@property
def cost(self):
return self.shares * self.price
def sell(self, shares):
self.shares -= shares
Verify that the class works properly, supports keyword arguments, and has a proper help signature.
>>> s = Stock(name='GOOG', price=490.1, shares=50)
>>> s.name
'GOOG'
>>> s.shares
50
>>> s.price
490.1
>>> help(Stock)
... look at the output ...>>>
Run your unit tests in teststock.py
again. You should
see at least one more test pass. Yay!
At this point, it’s going to look like we just took a giant step
backwards. Not only do the classes need the __init__()
method, they also need the _fields
variable for some of the
other methods to work (__repr__()
and
__setattr__()
). Plus, the use of self._init()
looks pretty hacky. We’ll work on this, but be patient.
[ Solution | Index | Exercise 6.1 | Exercise 6.3 ]
>>>
Advanced Python Mastery
...
A course by dabeaz
...
Copyright 2007-2023
.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License