This commit is contained in:
behinger (s-ccs 001) committed 2023-10-09 09:51:53 +00:00
commit ec20c173aa
9 files changed
+535 -18

No files matched your search

+2 -2
View File
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ website:
text: "📝 1 - Advanced Git and Contributing"
- href: "material/2_tue/git/tasks.qmd"
text: "🛠 1 - Git: Exercises"
- href: "material/2_tue/testing/slides.qmd"
- href: "material/2_tue/testing/slides.md"
text: "📝 2 - Testing"
- href: "material/2_tue/CI/missing.qmd"
- href: "material/2_tue/ci/slides.md"
text: "📝 3 - Continuous Integration"
- href: material/2_tue/codereview/slides.qmd
text: "📝 4 - Code Review"
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
There are many good ones out there. One we can recommend is the [one from GitHub](https://education.github.com/git-cheat-sheet-education.pdf).
+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Also [one from GitHub](https://github.github.io/actions-cheat-sheet/actions-cheat-sheet.pdf)
+395
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
---
type: slide
slideOptions:
transition: slide
width: 1400
height: 900
margin: 0.1
---
<style>
.reveal strong {
font-weight: bold;
color: orange;
}
.reveal p {
text-align: left;
}
.reveal section h1 {
color: orange;
}
.reveal section h2 {
color: orange;
}
.reveal code {
font-family: 'Ubuntu Mono';
color: orange;
}
.reveal section img {
background:none;
border:none;
box-shadow:none;
}
</style>
# Learning Goals
- Name and explain common workflows to automate in RSE.
- Explain the differences between the various continuous methodologies.
- Explain why automation is crucial in RSE.
- Write and understand basic automation scripts for GitHub Actions.
- s.t. we understand what `PkgTemplates` generates for us.
Material is taken and modified from the [SSE lecture](https://github.com/Simulation-Software-Engineering/Lecture-Material).
---
# 1. Workflow Automation
---
## Why Automation?
- Automatize tasks
- Run tests frequently, give feedback early etc.
- Ensure reproducible test environments
- Cannot forget automatized tasks
- Less burden to developer (and their workstation)
- Avoid manual errors
- Process often integrated in development workflow
- Example: Support by Git hooks or Git forges
---
## Typical Automation Tasks in RSE
- Check code formatting and quality
- Compile and test code for different platforms
- Generate coverage reports and visualization
- Build documentation and deploy it
- Build, package, and upload releases
---
## Continuous Methodologies (1/2)
- **Continuous Integration** (CI)
- Continuously integrate changes into "main" branch
- Avoids "merge hell"
- Relies on testing and checking code continuously
- Should be automatized
---
## Continuous Methodologies (2/2)
- **Continuous Delivery** (CD)
- Software is in a state that allows new release at any time
- Software package is built
- Actual release triggered manually
- **Continuous Deployment** (CD)
- Software is in a state that allows new release at any time
- Software package is built
- Actual release triggered automatically (continuously)
---
## Automation Services/Software
- [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions)
- [GitLab CI/CD](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/)
- [Circle CI](https://circleci.com/)
- [Travis CI](https://www.travis-ci.com/)
- [Jenkins](https://www.jenkins.io/)
- ...
---
# 2. GitHub Actions
---
## What is "GitHub Actions"?
> Automate, customize, and execute your software development workflows right in your repository with GitHub Actions.
From: [https://docs.github.com/en/actions](https://docs.github.com/en/actions)
---
## General Information
- Usage of GitHub's runners is [limited](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/usage-limits-billing-and-administration#usage-limits)
- Available for public repositories or accounts with subscription
- By default Actions run on GitHub's runners
- Linux, Windows, or MacOS
- Quickly evolving and significant improvements in recent years
---
## Components (1/2)
- [Workflow](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows): Runs one or more jobs
- [Event](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows): Triggers a workflow
- [Jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs): Set of steps (running on same runner)
- Steps executed consecutively and share data
- Jobs by default executed in parallel
- [Action](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions): Application performing common, complex task (step) often used in workflows
- [Runner](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/understanding-github-actions#runners): Server that runs jobs
- [Artifacts](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/essential-features-of-github-actions#sharing-data-between-jobs): Files to be shared between jobs or to be kept after workflow finishes
---
## Components (2/2)
<img src="https://docs.github.com/assets/cb-25535/mw-1440/images/help/actions/overview-actions-simple.webp" width=95%; style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top: 25px; padding-bottom: 25px; background: #eeeeee">
From [GitHub Actions tutorial](https://docs.github.com/en/actions)
---
## Setting up a Workflow
- Workflow file files stored `${REPO_ROOT}/.github/workflows`
- Configured via YAML file
```yaml
name: learn-github-actions
on: [push]
jobs:
check-bats-version:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- uses: actions/setup-node@v2
with:
node-version: '14'
- run: npm install -g bats
- run: bats -v
```
---
## Actions
```yaml
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- uses: actions/setup-node@v2
with:
node-version: '14'
```
- Integrated via `uses` directive
- Additional configuration via `with` (options depend on Action)
- Find actions in [marketplace](https://github.com/marketplace?type=actions)
- Write [own actions](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions)
---
## Some Useful Julia Actions
- Find on [gitHub.com/julia-actions](https://github.com/julia-actions/)
```
- uses: julia-actions/setup-julia@v1
with:
version: '1.9'
```
- More:
- `cache`: caches `~/.julia/artifacts/*` and `~/.julia/packages/*` to reduce runtime of CI
- `julia-buildpkg`: build package
- `julia-runtest`: run tests
- `julia-format`: format code
---
## User-specified Commands
```yaml
- name: "Single line command"
run: echo "Single line command"
- name: "Multi line command"
run: |
echo "First line"
echo "Second line. Directory ${PWD}"
workdir: tmp/
shell: bash
```
---
## Events
- Single or multiple events
```yaml
on: [push, fork]
```
- Activities
```yaml
on:
issue:
types:
- opened
- labeled
```
- Filters
```yaml
on:
push:
branches:
- main
- 'releases/**'
```
---
## Artifacts
- Data sharing between jobs and data upload
- Uploading artifact
```yaml
- name: "Upload artifact"
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2
with:
name: my-artifact
path: my_file.txt
retention-days: 5
```
- Downloading artifact
```yaml
- name: "Download a single artifact"
uses: actions/download-artifact@v2
with:
name: my-artifact
```
**Note**: Drop name to download all artifacts
---
## Test Actions Locally
- [act](https://github.com/nektos/act)
- Relies extensively on Docker
- User should be in `docker` group
- Run `act` from root of the repository
```text
act (runs all workflows)
act --job WORKFLOWNAME
```
- Environment is not 100% identical to GitHub's
- Workflows may fail locally, but work on GitHub
---
## Further Reading
- [What is Continuous Integration?](https://www.atlassian.com/continuous-delivery/continuous-integration)
- [GitHub Actions documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions)
- [GitHub Actions quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
---
# 3. Demo: Automation with GitHub Actions
---
## Setting up a Test Job
- Import [Julia test package repository](https://github.com/uekerman/JuliaTestPackage) (the same code we used for testing)
- Set up workflow file
```bash
mkdir -p .github/workflows
cd .github/workflows
vi format-check.yml
```
- Let's check whether our code is formatted correctly. Edit `format-check.yml` to have following content
```yaml
name: format-check
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
format:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- uses: julia-actions/setup-julia@v1
with:
version: '1.9'
- name: Install JuliaFormatter and format
run: |
julia -e 'using Pkg; Pkg.add(PackageSpec(name="JuliaFormatter"))'
julia -e 'using JuliaFormatter; format(".", verbose=true)'
- name: Format check
run: |
julia -e '
out = Cmd(`git diff --name-only`) |> read |> String
if out == ""
exit(0)
else
@error "Some files have not been formatted"
write(stdout, out)
exit(1)
end'
```
- `runs-on` does **not** refer to a Docker container, but to a runner tag.
- Add, commit, push
- After the push, inspect "Action" panel on GitHub repository
- GitHub will schedule a run (yellow dot)
- Hooray. We have set up our first action.
- Failing test example:
- Edit settings on GitHub that one can only merge if all tests pass:
- Settings -> Branches -> Branch protection rule
- Choose `main` branch
- Enable "Require status checks to pass before merging". Optionally enable "Require branches to be up to date before merging"
- Choose status checks that need to pass: `test`
- Click on "Create" at bottom of page.
- Create a new branch `break-code`.
- Edit some file, violate the formatting, commit it and push it to the branch. Afterwards open a new PR and inspect the failing test. We are also not able to merge the changes as the "Merge" button should be inactive.
---
## act Demo
- `act` is for quick checks while developing workflows, not for developing the code
- Check available jobs (at root of repository)
```bash
act -l
```
- Run jobs for `push` event (default event)
```bash
act
```
- Run a specific job
```bash
act -j test
```
---
# 4. Exercise
Set up GitHub Actions for your statistics package. They should format your code and run the tests. To structure and parallelize things, you could use two separate jobs.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ slideOptions:
}
</style>
## Learning Goals of the Git Lecture
# Learning Goals
- Refresh and organize students' existing knowledge on Git (learn how to learn more).
- Students can explain difference between merge and rebase and when to use what.
+4 -3
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
1. Work with any forge that you like and create a user account (we strongly recommend GitHub since we will need it later again).
2. Push your package `MyStatsPackage` to a remote repository.
3. Add a function `printOwner` to the package through a pull request. The function should print your (GitHub) user name (hard-coded).
4. Use the package from somebody else in the classroom and verify with `printOwner` that you use the correct package.
5. Fork this other package and contribute a function `printContributor` to it via a PR. Get a review and get it merged.
6. Add more functions to other packages of classmates that print funny things, but always ensure a linear history.
4. Start a new Julia environment and use your package through its url: `]add https://github.com/[username]/MyStatsPackage`.
5. Now use the package from somebody else in the classroom instead and verify with `printOwner` that you use the correct package.
6. Fork this other package and contribute a function `printContributor` to it via a PR. Get a review and get it merged.
7. Add more functions to other packages of classmates that print funny things, but always ensure a linear history.
@@ -1,9 +1,37 @@
---
format: revealjs
type: slide
slideOptions:
transition: slide
width: 1400
height: 900
margin: 0.1
---
<style>
.reveal strong {
font-weight: bold;
color: orange;
}
.reveal p {
text-align: left;
}
.reveal section h1 {
color: orange;
}
.reveal section h2 {
color: orange;
}
.reveal code {
font-family: 'Ubuntu Mono';
color: orange;
}
.reveal section img {
background:none;
border:none;
box-shadow:none;
}
</style>
# Learning Goals
- Justify the effort of developing tests to some extent
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
############################################################################
#### Execute code chunks separately in VSCODE by pressing 'Alt + Enter' ####
############################################################################
using Statistics
using Plots
using RDatasets
using GLM
##
trees = dataset("datasets", "trees")
scatter(trees.Girth, trees.Volume,
legend=false, xlabel="Girth", ylabel="Volume")
##
scatter(trees.Girth, trees.Volume,
legend=false, xlabel="Girth", ylabel="Volume")
plot!(x -> -37 + 5*x)
##
linmod1 = lm(@formula(Volume ~ Girth), trees)
##
linmod2 = lm(@formula(Volume ~ Girth + Height), trees)
##
r2(linmod1)
r2(linmod2)
linmod3 = lm(@formula(Volume ~ Girth + Height + Girth*Height), trees)
r2(linmod3)
##
using CSV
using HTTP
http_response = HTTP.get("https://vincentarelbundock.github.io/Rdatasets/csv/AER/SwissLabor.csv")
SwissLabor = DataFrame(CSV.File(http_response.body))
SwissLabor[!,"participation"] .= (SwissLabor.participation .== "yes")
##
model = glm(@formula(participation ~ age), SwissLabor, Binomial(), ProbitLink())
@@ -10,13 +10,26 @@ editor:
### Introductory Example: tree dataset from R
\[figure of raw data\]
```{julia}
using Statistics
using Plots
using RDatasets
trees = dataset("datasets", "trees")
scatter(trees.Volume, trees.Girth,
legend=false, xlabel="Girth", ylabel="Volume")
```
*Aim:* Find relationship between the *response variable* `volume` and
the *explanatory variable/covariate* `girth`? Can we predict the volume
of a tree given its girth?
\[figure including a straight line\]
```{julia}
scatter(trees.Girth, trees.Volume,
legend=false, xlabel="Girth", ylabel="Volume")
plot!(x -> -37 + 5*x)
```
First Guess: There is a linear relation!
@@ -55,6 +68,10 @@ rather use Julia to solve the problem.
\[use Julia code (existing package) to perform linear regression for
`volume ~ girth`\]
```{julia}
lm(@formula(Volume ~ Girth), trees)
```
*Interpretation of the Julia output:*
- column `estimate` : least square estimates for $\hat \beta_0$ and
@@ -166,6 +183,15 @@ the corresponding standard errors and the $t$-statistics. Test your
functions with the \`\`\`tree''' data set and try to reproduce the
output above.
```{julia}
r2(linmod1)
r2(linmod2)
linmod3 = lm(@formula(Volume ~ Girth + Height + Girth*Height), trees)
r2(linmod3)
```
## Generalized Linear Models
Classical linear model
@@ -206,29 +232,31 @@ $$
For the models above, these are:
+----------------------+---------------------+----------------------+
+--------------+---------------------+--------------------+
| Type of Data | Distribution Family | Link Function |
+======================+=====================+======================+
+==============+=====================+====================+
| continuous | Normal | identity: |
| | | |
| | | $$ |
| | | g(x)=x |
| | | $$ |
+----------------------+---------------------+----------------------+
+--------------+---------------------+--------------------+
| count | Poisson | log: |
| | | |
| | | $$ |
| | | g(x) = \log(x) |
| | | $$ |
+----------------------+---------------------+----------------------+
+--------------+---------------------+--------------------+
| binary | Bernoulli | logit: |
| | | |
| | | $$ |
| | | g(x) = \log\left |
| | | ( |
| | | \frac{x}{1-x}\right) |
| | | \ |
| | | f |
| | | rac{x}{1-x}\right) |
| | | $$ |
+----------------------+---------------------+----------------------+
+--------------+---------------------+--------------------+
In general, the parameter vector $\beta$ is estimated via maximizing the
likelihood, i.e.,
@@ -246,7 +274,18 @@ $$
In the Gaussian case, the maximum likelihood estimator is identical to
the least squares estimator considered above.
\[\[ Example in Julia: maybe `SwissLabor` \]\]
```{julia}
using CSV
using HTTP
http_response = HTTP.get("https://vincentarelbundock.github.io/Rdatasets/csv/AER/SwissLabor.csv")
SwissLabor = DataFrame(CSV.File(http_response.body))
SwissLabor[!,"participation"] .= (SwissLabor.participation .== "yes")
model = glm(@formula(participation ~ age^2),
SwissLabor, Binomial(), ProbitLink())
```
**Task 3:** Reproduce the results of our data analysis of the `tree`
data set using a generalized linear model with normal distribution