# Table of Contents - [Database anti-patterns](#database-anti-patterns) - [Using `VARCHAR` instead of `TEXT` (PostgreSQL)](#using-varchar-instead-of-text-postgresql) Database anti-patterns ====================== Using `VARCHAR` instead of `TEXT` (PostgreSQL) ---------------------------------------------- Unless you absolutely restrict the width of a text column for data consistency reason, don't do it. This [benchmark](http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/02/charx-vs-varcharx-vs-varchar-vs-text/) shows that there's fundamentally no difference in performance between `char(n)`, `varchar(n)`, `varchar` and `text`. Here's why you should pick `text`: * `char(n)`: takes more space than necessary when dealing with values shorter than n. * `varchar(n)`: it's difficult to change the width. * `varchar` is just like `text`. * `text` does not have the width problem that `char(n)` and `varchar(n)` and has a cleaner name than `varchar`.