Add configuration complexity
This commit is contained in:
parent
925ff21586
commit
a9c19d57c6
@ -687,6 +687,9 @@ See also the Writing section
|
|||||||
- [Your configs suck? Try a real programming language](https://beepb00p.xyz/configs-suck.html)
|
- [Your configs suck? Try a real programming language](https://beepb00p.xyz/configs-suck.html)
|
||||||
- Most modern config formats suck
|
- Most modern config formats suck
|
||||||
- Use a real programming language
|
- Use a real programming language
|
||||||
|
- [Code rant: The Configuration Complexity Clock](https://mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2012/05/configuration-complexity-clock.html)
|
||||||
|
- I’m not saying that it’s never appropriate to implement complex configuration, a rules-engine or a DSL, Indeed I would jump at the chance of building a DSL given the right requirements, but I am saying that you should understand the implications and recognise where you are on the clock before you go down that route.
|
||||||
|
- Initially there was hope that non-technical business users would be able to use the GUI to configure the application, but that turned out to be a false hope; the mapping of business rules into the engine requires a level of expertise that only some members of the development team possess.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Continuous Integration (CI)
|
### Continuous Integration (CI)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user