PG code discussion
This commit is contained in:
@@ -340,10 +340,12 @@ Even when the Jacobian is singular (because the function is not injective, chaot
|
||||
The update obtained with a regular gradient descent method has surprising shortcomings.
|
||||
The physical gradient instead allows us to more accurately backpropagate through nonlinear functions, provided that we have access to good inverse functions.
|
||||
|
||||
Before moving on to including PGs in NN training processes, the next example will illustrate ...
|
||||
Before moving on to including PGs in NN training processes, the next example will illustrate the differences between these approaches with a practical example.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**todo, integrate comments below?**
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**TODO, sometime, integrate comments below?**
|
||||
|
||||
Old Note:
|
||||
The inverse function to a simulator is typically the time-reversed physical process.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user