PG conclusions, list formatting
This commit is contained in:
@@ -57,14 +57,14 @@ Bringing these numerical methods back into the picture will be one of the centra
|
||||
goals of the next sections.
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Pro:
|
||||
- uses physical model
|
||||
- derivatives can be conveniently compute via backpropagation
|
||||
- Uses physical model.
|
||||
- Derivatives can be conveniently compute via backpropagation.
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Con:
|
||||
- quite slow ...
|
||||
- physical constraints are enforced only as soft constraints
|
||||
- largely incompatible _classical_ numerical methods
|
||||
- accuracy of derivatives relies on learned representation
|
||||
- Quite slow ...
|
||||
- Physical constraints are enforced only as soft constraints.
|
||||
- Largely incompatible _classical_ numerical methods.
|
||||
- Accuracy of derivatives relies on learned representation.
|
||||
|
||||
Next, let's look at how we can leverage numerical methods to improve the DL accuracy and efficiency
|
||||
by making use of differentiable solvers.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user