started figures
This commit is contained in:
20
overview.md
20
overview.md
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ natural language processing {cite}`radford2019language`,
|
||||
and more recently also for protein folding {cite}`alquraishi2019alphafold`.
|
||||
The field is very vibrant, and quickly developing, with the promise of vast possibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
At the same time, the successes of deep learning (DL) approaches
|
||||
On the other hand, the successes of deep learning (DL) approaches
|
||||
has given rise to concerns that this technology has
|
||||
the potential to replace the traditional, simulation-driven approach to
|
||||
science. Instead of relying on models that are carefully crafted
|
||||
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ and _deep learning_.
|
||||
One central reason for the importance of this combination is
|
||||
that DL approaches are simply not powerful enough by themselves.
|
||||
Given the current state of the art, the clear breakthroughs of DL
|
||||
in physical applications are outstanding, the proposed techniques are novel,
|
||||
sometimes difficult to apply, and
|
||||
in physical applications are outstanding.
|
||||
The proposed techniques are novel, sometimes difficult to apply, and
|
||||
significant practical difficulties combing physics and DL persist.
|
||||
Also, many fundamental theoretical questions remain unaddressed, most importantly
|
||||
regarding data efficienty and generalization.
|
||||
@@ -78,6 +78,16 @@ at our disposal, and use them wherever we can.
|
||||
I.e., our goal is to _reconcile_ the data-centered
|
||||
viewpoint and the physical simuation viewpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
The resulting methods have a huge potential to improve
|
||||
what can be done with numerical methods: e.g., in scenarios
|
||||
where solves target cases from a certain well-defined problem
|
||||
domain repeatedly, it can make a lot of sense to once invest
|
||||
significant resources to train
|
||||
an neural network that supports the repeated solves. Based on the
|
||||
domain-specific specialization of this network, such a hybrid
|
||||
could vastly outperform traditional, generic solvers. And despite
|
||||
the many open questions, first publications have demonstrated
|
||||
that this goal is not overly far away.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Categorization
|
||||
@@ -134,10 +144,10 @@ each of the different techniques is particularly useful.
|
||||
|
||||
To be a bit more specific, _physics_ is a huge field, and we can't cover everything...
|
||||
|
||||
```{note} The focus of this book is on...
|
||||
```{note} The focus of this book lies on...
|
||||
- _Field-based simulations_ (no Lagrangian methods)
|
||||
- Combinations with _deep learning_ (plenty of other interesting ML techniques, but not here)
|
||||
- Experiments as _outlook_ (replace synthetic data with real)
|
||||
- Experiments as _outlook_ (replace synthetic data with real-world observations)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
It's also worth noting that we're starting to build the methods from some very
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user