Explained std vs var in N(mu, var) formulation.
Some book use std, I use variance.
This commit is contained in:
parent
741d785e03
commit
26cf805dc3
@ -1114,7 +1114,9 @@
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"$$\\text{temp} \\sim \\mathcal{N}(22,4)$$\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"This is an extremely important result. Gaussians allow me to capture an infinite number of possible values with only two numbers! With the values $\\mu=22$ and $\\sigma^2=4$ I can compute the distribution of measurements for over any range."
|
||||
"This is an extremely important result. Gaussians allow me to capture an infinite number of possible values with only two numbers! With the values $\\mu=22$ and $\\sigma^2=4$ I can compute the distribution of measurements for over any range.\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"> Some sources use $\\mathcal N (\\mu, \\sigma)$ instead of $\\mathcal N (\\mu, \\sigma^2)$. Either is fine, they are both conventions. You need to keep in mind which form is being used if you see a term such as $\\mathcal{N}(22,4)$. In this book I always use $\\mathcal N (\\mu, \\sigma^2)$, so $\\sigma=2$, $\\sigma^2=4$ for this example."
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user